Search This Blog

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Dangerous waste

If you live in DC or the surrounding areas, drop off your hazardous wastes here:
Date: Saturdays 8am-3pm
Location: 4900 John F. McCormack Road. Washignton, Dc, 20011

The DPW takes everything from hazardous chemicals to old television sets. (If you are unable to this, donate your old usable items on Craigslist). Ever district has its own DPW site, so find yours!

Acceptable household hazardous waste and e-cycling items include:

  • Acids
  • Aerosols
  • Antifreeze
  • Asbestos tile
  • Batteries
  • Cleaning chemicals
  • Drain openers
  • Fluorescent light bulbs
  • Furniture stripper
  • Stains
  • Varnish
  • Fertilizer
  • Lighter fluid
  • Mercury thermometers and mercury containing devices
  • Moth balls
  • Motor oil
  • Paint
  • Pesticides and
  • Poisons
  • Roofing tar
  • Solvents/thinners
  • Transmission fluids
  • Windshield wiper and
  • Brake fluids
  • Wood preservatives

Electronics Recycling Acceptable Items:

  • Audio/visual equipment
  • Audio cassettes
  • Camcorders
  • CD Rom drives CDs/DVDs
  • Cell Phones
  • Computers and monitors
  • Connectors / Cords / Wire
  • Copy machines
  • Fax machines
  • Floppy drives Hard drives
  • Memory chips
  • Network / Video / Sound cards
  • Pagers
  • Power supplies
  • Printers
  • Scrap computer plastic
  • Scrap computer metal
  • Tape drives
  • TVs
  • VCRs
  • VCR tapes
  • Video games & Software

http://dc.gov/DC/DPW/Services+on+Your+Block/Recycling/Household+Hazardous+Waste+-+E-cycling-+Document+Shredding

Sunday, September 19, 2010

For the Political Win

Making aware the pedigree of "sound science":
"Sound science is a phrase often used by corporate public relations and government agency spokesmen to describe the scientific research used to justify a claim or position. Sound science, however, has no specific scientific definition itself, so the phrase is used subjectively. “Sound science” is not a synonym of “good science” practices, but rather it is an ideological policy statement more about the criteria for the use of science in policy making. It is invoked mostly to call into question the validity of a given study or scientific statement. Many advocates of Sound Science are Anti-Science believers."

The following article discusses the current GOP Senate Candidates viewpoint on climate change and government responsibility. Despite the fact that over 97% of climate change scientists claim that global warming is significantly being impacted by human activity, most all of the current candidates oppose climate action (specifically after climate advocate Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) lost his primary to Christine O'Donnel).

See the breakdown on the individual candidates and their stances in Wonk Room's report.



GOP Senate Candidates Oppose Climate Science And Policy
 by Brad Johnson, ThinkProgress Wonk Room Climate Editor

A comprehensive Wonk Room survey of the Republican candidates for the U.S. Senate finds that nearly all dispute the scientific consensus that the United States must act to fight global warming pollution. In May, 2010, the National Academies of Science reported to Congress that “the U.S. should act now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and develop a national strategy to adapt to the inevitable impacts of climate change” because global warming is “caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for — and in many cases is already affecting — a broad range of human and natural systems.”

This finding is shared by scientific bodies around the world. However, in the alternate reality of the fossil-fueled right wing, climate science is confused or a conspiracy, and policies to limit pollution would destroy the economy.

Remarkably, of the dozens of Republicans vying for the 37 Senate seats in the 2010 election, no one supports climate action, after climate advocate Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) lost his primary to Christine O’Donnell. Even former climate advocates Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) now toe the science-doubting party line.

Many of the Senate candidates are signatories of the Koch Industries’ Americans For Prosperity No Climate Tax pledge and the FreedomWorks Contract From America. The second plank of the Contract From America is to “Reject Cap & Trade: Stop costly new regulations that would increase unemployment, raise consumer prices, and weaken the nation’s global competitiveness with virtually no impact on global temperatures.”

In reality, a carbon cap-and-trade market — by rewarding work instead of pollution — would increase jobs, lower electricity bills, restore American competitiveness, and forestall a climate catastrophe.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Checks and balances

I read the following excerpt in an email my medical university sent out last year. It had repeatedly pervaded my thoughts, and so thankfully today, I happened to come across it once more. Thoughts? Especially in regards to future health reform endeavors, current problems with "checks-and-balances" in government entities, and medicare/medicaid abuse, etc.

(Also-->see: http://fragmented-shilpagogna.blogspot.com/2009/12/sutton-robbed-banks-because-thats-where.html)

Futhermore, in my current Health Law classes at GW, I have come to understand more the evolution of the "no-duty" to treat principle, non-disparate treatment under EMTALA, and the civil rights law's pertinence to health care accessibility. I posed the question if it statistically significant, that health care professionals would treat a racial minority (with equal or less symptoms) before treating a non-minority patient (with equal or worse symptoms)? In terms of health care accessibility and usage of Medicare/aid, these racial minority groups tend to be African American. Since it is not entirely quantifiable, do you think it is the case that health care professionals end up violating such laws in the opposite direction, as to avoid a bad reputation?

"Dear Mr. President:
During my shift in the Emergency Room last night, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient whose smile revealed an expensive shiny gold tooth, whose body was adorned with a wide assortment of elaborate and costly tattoos, who wore a very expensive brand of tennis shoes and who chatted on a new cellular telephone equipped with a popular R&B ringtone.


While glancing over her patient chart, I happened to notice that her payer status was listed as "Medicaid"! During my examination of her, the patient informed me that she smokes more than one pack of cigarettes every day, eats only at fast-food take-outs, and somehow still has money to buy pretzels and beer. And, you and our Congress expect me to pay for this woman's health care? I contend that our nation's "health care crisis" is not the result of a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. Rather, it is the result of a "crisis of culture" a culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on luxuries and vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance. It is a culture based in the irresponsible credo that "I can do whatever I want to because someone else will always take care of me". Once you fix this "culture crisis" that rewards irresponsibility and dependency, you'll be amazed at how quickly our nation's health care difficulties will disappear.

Respectfully,
ROGER STARNER JONES, MD"

Monday, September 13, 2010

Raw foodism

In my latest transition from a vegetarian to a raw food diet, I thought I would provide a few recipes which could help those motivated to make the switch too.


Mixed Kale Salad
- 2 carrots peeled and shredded
- 1 cup of grape tomatoes
- 1 cup red Kale finely chopped
- unsalted shelled pupmkin seeds
- 1/4 red onion cut into thin rings
- juice of one lemon
- 2 tbs cold pressed olive oil
- 2 cloves chopped garlic
- sea salt, cayenne, cumin
Mix all ingredients and chill


Raw Falafel
- 1 cup sprouted garbanzo beans
- 3 tbs sprouted pinta seeds
- 1 tbsp minced garlic
- 1 cup miinced fresh cilantro
- 1/2 tbs sea salt
- 1/3 cup minced fresh parsley
- 1/2 cup minced onion
- 1/2 c. fresh-squeezed lemon juice
- 1/2 tsp cayenne
- 1 tsp cumin
Blend all ingredients. Form blended mixture into 1-inch by 3-inch elongated patties. Place 2 tbsp of olive oil in slow cooker, and allow to cook for 90 minutes.

Tabouleh
- 1/4 cup medium grain bulgur cooked in slowcooker
- 1/4 cups water
- 1 cup loosely packed, roughly chopped flat-leaf parsley, about 3 bunches
- 1/2 cups peeled and diced tomatoes, about 3 to 5 Roma tomatoes,
- 1/4 cup green onions chopped, white and some of the green, about 2 green onions
- 1/4 cup chopped mint leaves
Dressing:
- 1/4 cup freshly squeezed lemon juice
- 1/4 teaspoon minced garlic
- Pinch seasalt
- 1 tablespoon extra-virgin olive oil
Toss together main ingredients in dressing, chill and enjoy!

Although vegetarian dishes can have its health benefits, many vegetarian cooked foods can be unhealthy too. I am not even talking about overly-processed "meat-free" vegetarian meals/snacks. Strictly from a pure food p.o.v, the more you cook a food product, and the higher temperature you cook your food in, the more the item becomes acidic, as well as toxic/less digestable. I am not, by any means, advocating vegetariansim, as I believe meat consumption (through proper and humane means) has its benefits. In fact, I come from a family full of carnivores. However, over the past year, I have become increasingly turned off by it, and decided to become entirely vegetarian. An explosion in packaged and convenience foods in the late 20th century has directly been linked to a steady rise in obesity, diabetes, and other chronic illnesses. Many foods that were once thought of as treats, such as soda and candy, are now in our daily diets. Portion sizes continue to evolve and fast food restaurants are sprouting along every Main Street and highway in America. Today, the average supermarket is packed with frozen meals, packaged dinners, side dishes and canned goods replete with artificial colors, flavors, preservatives and many other ingredients whose long term effects remain unknown, despite passing FDA scrutiny. So, before you plan your next meal, think about what you are eating. Make each meal count!

In tribute!

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/14/health/14kelsey.html?_r=1&hpw
"Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey is 96 now, nearly deaf and barely mobile, as modest as her faded house in this Washington suburb. And though her story is nearly forgotten, she was once America’s most admired civil servant — celebrated for her dual role in saving thousands of newborns from the perils of the drug thalidomide and in serving as midwife to modern pharmaceutical regulation. "

The late 1950's was a time of a new beginnings: a time when optimism and energy flourished. World War II was now a memory, and instead it became replaced with growing visions and a developing scientific epicenter. Innovations became prevalent and tomorrowland seemingly arrived. Housewives were serving TV dinners in less than 5 minutes of preparation and X-ray machines were being found at shoe stores everywhere. It would only be a matter of a few years before Boeings 707s would be able to transverse nations in a matter of hours, or faster vehicles would drive coast-to-coast on Eisenhower's new turnpike systems. Successful nations only became more and more so, following the advent of technology, which I can only say cast a heavy and increasing anxiety of international threat of annihilation. By the late 1950's nuclear war drills became commonplace in schools across North America, only to be supported by a booming fallout shelter business.

Recurring threats between the U.S., Southeast Asia, and the Suez Canal only reminded the world that World War II was not the last word. Central and eastern european nations, I could say, were developing the most rapidly. The USSR was the first to launch the Sputnik satellite, and when the launch of the first U.S. satellite exploded in 1957, the USSR was applauding the launch of their second satellite. Perhaps Germany experienced the shorter end of the stick during WWII, as the final years of the war had been a living nightmare. Most citizens had no idea if they would wake up alive the next morning, and had even began expecting to open their eyes to bombing or dangerous wastes. So it was no surprise, that when tranquilizers and sleeping pills were introduced in Germany in the early 1960's, citizens were supported to partake in its usage as a way to relieve post-war anxiety. I found that almost 1 million people in Great Britain were using barbiturates daily and almost 15% of central European prescriptions were a barbiurate or sedative of some sort. Not to mention, suicide by sleeping pills was the seemingly popular way to check out. The U.S. didn't stray far behind, while they produced over 4 billion sedatives in just 1955 alone. Pharmaceuticals flourished. Get this, the U.S. actually allowed usage of a prescription medicine that could speed up the process of suntanning: "You can turn the color of a life guard!" was at the head of their vision statement. I am sure most everyone is familiar with Huxley's Brave New World, where he described how the dependence upon alcohol in forgetting Communist threats and society's woes would soon be cross-tolerated with invention of a "wonder drug"--a pill which could help people unwind without, psychiatrically speaking, ellicit any abusive or dependent symptoms. "Will the pharmacologist be able to do better thant he brewers and distillers?"

It was no surprise then, that just a month after Huxley's statement, that Germany began distribution of a newly, and uninvestigated, "wonderdrug" Thalidomide within large parts of Europe. This was done under the leading German pharmaceutical company Gruenthal, which was mainly given its fame after mold production of industrial penicillin. Oh and by fame, I mean notorious for throwing drugs in the market without any sense of adequate testing...forget exhaustive testing at the least. Thalidomide was first administered to help decrease feelings of uncomfort in pregnant women. Soon enough, it was discovered that this drug had absolutely no effect as an antibiotic, but what it did show, was a high sedative affect in humans. Surprisngly, this drug showed no affects in animals. In fact, the toxicity test results were beyond remarkable. Even at the highest doses, it was nearly impossible to attain the LD50 (the dose at which 50% of the subjects die). (WHICH THIS BRINGS ME TO AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT SUBJECT RELATING TO VEGANS AND USERS OF MEDICINE. EVERY SINGLE DRUG AVAILABLE IN THE U.S HAS BEEN TESTED AND KILLED MILLIONS OF ANIMALS). By the way, there were at least some rules, which detailed that drug could not be put on the European markets without "successful results" (even slightly below an LD50 denotes success) in both humans and animals. So of course Gruenthal manipulated their research, to forcibly induce results with compound treatments to show that, in company, Thalidomide can produce sedative effects.

Through fiscal means, Gruenthal managed to leak its force within scientific journals internationally recognized, supporting the usage of Thalidomide. Giving out free samples to companies and physician offices everywhere, advertisements with children reaching for a bottle of Thalidomide (Distaval) stated "This medicine could save your child's life" (as it was also used as a means to calm children down in anxious moments. It even came to the point that this drug was commonly known as the "babysitter" as it had the powerful ability to always produce consistent sedative effects. In fact, this drug became so commonly used that pregnant women did not even list it on injested medications on routine physicals. Eventually, this drug found its way across the entire world, (and for once I am happy to admit that the FDA disallowed entrance of this drug into the U.S) totalling over 12.4 million dollars of sales in 1961. Thaldomide began being mixed into other pharmaceutical treatments, to which even an addition to common advil and tylenol.

This is a PERFECT example how fiscal interests and greedy powers can inflict horrible results. The lack of extensive research, and the growing rush to get a "goldmine" drug into the market ended up, within JUST TWO YEARS OF ADMINISTRATION, producing birth defects in the thousands. Children were being born with fetal limb abnromalities and loss of external structures, such as the ears and nose. And JUST three months ago, Germany finally began dispensing compensation for thalidomide victims (OVER 40 YEARS LATER. please read!!: http://www.goinglegal.com/article_863416_101.html). Thalidomide, even now, is still being released as an off-label drug as a "special needs" medication to patients with severe pain. In truth, Thalidomide may have some beneficial effects to those women whom are not pregnant or not planning to become pregnant. However, that is only a short-term vision. It is, an essence, a hippocratic dilemna. It can destroy you or it can save you. Though, there is nothing to be said until it undergoes years of extensive treatment, as such all pharmaceuticals should. YOUR PATIENTS ARE NOT YOUR RESEARCH. And to all of us becoming physicians, I think the take-home statement is this: be aware that short-term success does not mean long-term benefits. We may be doing more harm than good. I think the even bigger question may be why individuals choose to venture into pharmaceuticals for purposes so unnecessary. There are clearly more homeopathic and physical ways of doing so. Listen to your body, not the pills.